Lacking Respect
‘WHY?’ QUESTIONS No.9
Num 12:8 Why then were you not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?”
In Christian circles in the West, there often seems a poor attitude in respect of leaders. This seems far less so in churches in the Far East, where respect is often a national characteristic. Yet the Bible has a lot to say about respect for leaders, spiritual and non-spiritual. In the New Testament, the apostle Paul was very clear about this: “Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.” (Rom 13:1,2) In the day in which we live, authority often seems to have a bad name, because those in authority sometimes publicly abuse their position.
The example of the President of the United States seems to be a reasonable illustration. It appears that the position of the President is very highly respected, yet the individual who holds that position may have a poor public image. In England the position of Prime Minister doesn’t seem to hold the same awe and respect, because the English system makes that person be seen more as simply a senior Member of Parliament. When Paul speaks of the authorities, he speaks of the position of one who is there to uphold God’s Laws – although in a modern democracy it is rarely seen like that. Yet that is the role of authority, to maintain order and thus protect society from evil. Thus when Paul says to Titus, “Remind the people to be subject to rulers and authorities, to be obedient,” (Titus 3:1) his call is not to be obedient to the whims and fancies of men, but to the role of authority. That’s why Peter was able to say, “We must obey God rather than men!” (Acts 6:26) because where men opposed God, the call was to obey God.
In the situation in our verse today, again it is a question from God to people, not the other way round. The Lord is chastising Miriam and Aaron. We find, “Miriam and Aaron began to talk against Moses because of his Cushite wife, for he had married a Cushite. “Has the LORD spoken only through Moses?” they asked. “Hasn’t he also spoken through us?” And the LORD heard this.” (Num 12:1,2). No doubt the enemy nudged Moses’ brother and sister and they began to think about what was happening and spoke against him. They didn’t approve of Moses’ wife, but it seems that the Lord didn’t have a problem with her!
Thus it is that the Lord challenges them about their lack of respect, but first He points out to them something about Moses’ position: “When a prophet of the LORD is among you, I reveal myself to him in visions, I speak to him in dreams. But this is not true of my servant Moses; he is faithful in all my house. With him I speak face to face, clearly and not in riddles; he sees the form of the LORD.” (Num 12:6-8). What was the Lord saying? He was saying, look at what happens with Moses. He’s not like an ordinary prophet of mine; he has a special position with me whereby we communicate face to face. Don’t you realize this? The Lord’s subsequent response was to bring public disgrace to Miriam (see v.9-15) who instigated this rebellion against Moses.
There is a general principle in Scripture which is very powerful: when God brings someone into leadership, heaven help you if you raise your hand against them. We see this principle being worked out, not only in the case of Moses, but years later in the case of David and Saul. Saul had been appointed by God at the people’s request, but had acted badly and been rejected by the Lord – yet he was still king. The Lord then raised up David, but Saul sought to kill him. A couple of times David had the opportunity to kill Saul but his response to the prompting of his men to do it was, “Don’t destroy him! Who can lay a hand on the LORD ’s anointed and be guiltless? As surely as the LORD lives,” he said, “the LORD himself will strike him; either his time will come and he will die, or he will go into battle and perish. But the LORD forbid that I should lay a hand on the LORD ’s anointed.” (1 Sam 26:9-11). i.e. if Saul has to be removed, let the Lord do it! We mustn’t!
In the New Testament, the writer to the Hebrews wrote, “Obey your leaders and submit to their authority. They keep watch over you as men who must give an account. Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no advantage to you.” (Heb 13:17). What he is saying there is, respect the authority that they have and realize that they are accountable to God and therefore (implied) God will deal with wayward leaders. Our response, if we have a problem with a leader, is to take it to the Lord. It is not to rise up against that leader. Obviously we need to be aware that if the leader is committing blatant sin, that is something different, and others in leadership should bring a challenge to repent, but that is rare.
The writer also implies that leadership can be a real burden in the kingdom of God, and the wise flock do what they can to bless their leaders not pull them down. Spiritual leaders are the first in line for attacks from the enemy, and the person or people rising up against God’s leader, is/are simply becoming a tool in the hand of the enemy. As difficult as it may be sometimes, we must leave them in God’s hands. This is what Miriam and Aaron should have learnt. This is what that was all about. Ultimately it is a basic question of belief. Do we believe the Lord can deal with those in spiritual authority? If we simply don’t like the way our leader(s) is leading then our response is to go and talk it through with the Lord first, and then perhaps graciously share your concerns with that man or men. Remember, this is God’s man, so treat him accordingly.
2 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- December 2009 (10)
- November 2009 (30)
- October 2009 (27)
- September 2009 (29)
- August 2009 (14)
- July 2009 (23)
- June 2009 (30)
- May 2009 (26)
- April 2009 (24)
- March 2009 (32)
- February 2009 (27)
- January 2009 (31)
-
Categories
- Advent
- Anguish of Job
- Beatitudes
- Effects of the Cross
- Ephesians
- God in the Psalms
- Holy Week
- Isaiah
- James
- John's Gospel
- Lent meditations
- Lessons from Israel
- Lessons from the Law
- Luke's Gospel
- Matthew's Gospel
- People who met Jesus
- Questioning God
- Resurrection
- Revelation of God
- Reviews
- Rom 1 & 2
- Son of God
- Uncategorized
- Walking with God
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
My question is this;
Is there a parallel between the respect that a wife has for her husband and that an individual should have for elected public leaders?
Respect is respect. I find your question intriguing for you only speak of the respect that a wife has for her husband and yet Peter speaks of husbands having respect for their wives (1 Pet 3:7). Respect is all about honouring a person for who they are. Peter says husbands are to have respect for their wives for two reasons. The first is the physical reason – that in many ways the wife tends to be physically weaker and needs the care and the protection of the husband. The second reason balances that: husbands are to respect their wives because they too are heirs of salvation, echoing Paul saying there is no male or female in salvation (Gal 3:28).
The crucial thing about ‘respect’ is that it is all about relationships and honouring people when they are not perfect. In my meditation I briefly refer to respecting the role or position, as of the president of the United States. The person may be obviously imperfect but we respect the position he seeks to fill. I suspect this is what your question is about in marriage – respecting the God-given role of leader, the one answerable to God. Although we think respect can be demanded, it cannot. Respect is earned. In Eph 5:25 Paul’s call to husbands is to love them sacrificially, laying down their lives for their wives. I find that whenever a husband truly does that, the respect follows. The question of unbelieving husbands is covered by Peter (1 Pet 3) prior to the verse I quoted above. It is essentially, wives respect your husbands even though they are not yet Christians, love them and bless them in such a way that they will be won over. It is clear from that that respect referred to there is not to be a forced or demanded thing, but something that is given in grace. On one side of the coin it is earned and on the other side it is given. I hope that gives you something to think about. Thank you for writing.